Canadian Grandmother's Fight Against a Small-Town Public School's Sexual Targeting of Her 11-Year-Old Granddaughter.

“They were exposed to shocking materials – sex toys, packers [penis-shaped products to stuff in your pants], and other explicit items. She was only 11!”

On Saturday, hundreds of protestors gathered on Parliament Hill to commemorate the two-year anniversary since the infamous, now declared illegal, state-led crackdown when hundreds of anonymous, unidentified, and heavily militarized police officers disbanded the legally sanctioned “Freedom Convoy” on Feb. 18, 2022.

Among those present was a grandmother whom RAIR Foundation USA spoke to. She attended not only to commemorate the event but also to protest against the controversial Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) curriculum implemented by Justin Trudeau’s government across Canada.

This curriculum, aimed at young children in public schools, including her granddaughter, has sparked widespread concern among parents across Canada and the West. Many parents have tirelessly advocated against the indoctrination and sexualization of children through the SOGI curriculum, particularly concerning the administration of highly risky and life-altering medical treatments to children, often without parental awareness or consent.

This contentious issue has led to the erasure of fundamental parental rights.

Holding a sign adorned with two strikingly similar symbols, she engaged in a conversation with RAIR. One of these symbols, identified by the FBI as a marker used by pedophiles to indicate their sexual preferences. The other symbol, which bore an eerie resemblance, was discovered on page 3 of the Trudeau Foundation’s 2015 annual report. This juxtaposition left many questioning the inclusion of such a controversial and perverse symbol in the group’s official report.

As she shared her story with RAIR, a harrowing tale unfolded—a Nova Scotia grandmother’s relentless battle against highly inappropriate sexualized materials infiltrating her 11-year-old granddaughter’s supposedly secure school environment. The grandmother and her daughter are working tirelessly to safeguard her granddaughter and other children from the intrusion of such materials by the state.

“It all began when my granddaughter, just 11 years old, came home from school one day,” the grandmother begins. “She recounted a session on ‘Sexual Health,’ facilitated by an outside group, where they were exposed to shocking materials – sex toys, packers [penis-shaped products to stuff in your pants], shorts with a fake dick on it, and other explicit items. She was only 11!”

Describing the scene, she details how the “lesson,” under the guise of education, traumatically exposed young minds to adult content. “They pulled the children from the Gay-Straight Alliance, which she was a part of in elementary school, and subjected them to this without warning,” she laments. “It was wholly inappropriate.”

Incensed by the violation of innocence, the grandmother took to social media to voice her concerns, only to be met with disbelief and accusations of falsehood from her community. “They called me a liar,” she recalls with a sigh. “But I knew what I saw, what my granddaughter experienced. It was real.”

Undeterred by the backlash, she urged other parents to investigate for themselves. “I implored them to visit the school, to scrutinize the library, and see what materials were accessible to their children,” she explains. “Some of it was displayed prominently, easily accessible to young eyes.”

Yet, when attempts were made to address the issue with law enforcement, she was met with bureaucratic indifference. “The RCMP dismissed it, claiming it fell outside their jurisdiction since it occurred within the school,” she recounts, frustration evident in her voice. “But where else are parents supposed to turn when their children are exposed to such content?”

Furthermore, she was informed that there were “no laws concerning the lowest age for children to engage in sexual activity.”

The grandmother’s resolve only strengthened when faced with resistance from school authorities. “The principal of the elementary school went so far as to publicly label my daughter, who had spoken out, as a liar,” she reveals. “Yet, when confronted with the truth, she issued a hollow apology, devoid of accountability.”

Reflecting on the broader implications, she emphasizes the need for vigilance and advocacy. “We cannot remain silent in the face of such blatant disregard for our children’s well-being,” she declares passionately. “It’s our duty to stand up, to speak out, and to demand change.”

She concludes her interview with a firm resolve: “We must prioritize the safety of our children above all else. We cannot tolerate such harm. Action is imperative.”

Regrettably, this is the reality in public schools across Canada, where even small towns in sparsely populated provinces like Nova Scotia are affected by inappropriate and perverse state intervention.

Source